In re Williams

1 Citing case

  1. Paloian v. Grupo Serla S.A. de C.V. (In re GGSI Liquidation Inc.)

    355 B.R. 691 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. 2006)   Cited 8 times
    Holding "[i]t is clear from the plain language of § 362 that the automatic stay `operates as a stay, applicable to all entities' and is not only restricted to creditors of the debtor. 11 U.S.C. § 362"

    Therefore, it has been said that while Fed.R.Bankr.P. 9020 provides a benchmark against which to measure a respondent's due process rights to notice and opportunity to be heard, that Rule need not always be followed in order to invoke a court's contempt power. In re Williams, 191 B.R. 497, 502 (M.D. Ga. 1996).