From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Williams

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jun 28, 2024
24-cv-02895-HSG (N.D. Cal. Jun. 28, 2024)

Opinion

24-cv-02895-HSG

06-28-2024

In re WILLIAMS.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

On or about May 14, 2024, the Court docketed a 1-page handwritten document received from Plaintiff. Dkt. No. 1. Because Plaintiff sought relief from this Court, the Court opened an action pursuant to this filing. That same day, the Court sent Plaintiff deficiency notices, instructing Plaintiff that he was required to file, within twenty-eight days, (1) a complaint on a complaint by a prisoner form, and (2) an in forma pauperis application. Dkt. Nos. 2, 3. The deadline to file these documents has passed, and Plaintiff has not filed the required documents. This action cannot proceed without a complaint on the proper form and either the filing fee or an in forma pauperis application. Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED for failure to file a complaint on the proper form and for failure to either pay the filing fee or file an in forma pauperis application. The dismissal is without prejudice to Plaintiff filing a motion to reopen the action. Any motion to reopen must be accompanied by a complaint on the proper form and either the filing fee or an in forma pauperis application.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

In re Williams

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jun 28, 2024
24-cv-02895-HSG (N.D. Cal. Jun. 28, 2024)
Case details for

In re Williams

Case Details

Full title:In re WILLIAMS.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Jun 28, 2024

Citations

24-cv-02895-HSG (N.D. Cal. Jun. 28, 2024)