From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Whittle

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Columbia
Oct 16, 2008
Case No. 07-00317 (Bankr. D.D.C. Oct. 16, 2008)

Opinion

Case No. 07-00317.

October 16, 2008


ORDER DISALLOWING CLAIM OF EVERHOME MORTGAGE


Upon consideration of the Objection of the Trustee, the proof of claim filed August 26, 2008, by Everhome Mortgage, with a pre-petition arrears claim of $12,293.93, as an untimely filed claim, and the court record herein, it is,

ORDERED, that the Trustee's Objection be and the same is hereby sustained, and said claim filed August 26, 2008, is hereby disallowed and expunged from the record.

MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER Based on In re Boucek, 280 B.R. 533, 537-38 (Bankr. D. Kan. 2002), and In re Mickens, 2005 WL 375661 (Bankr. D.D.C. Feb. 14, 2005), the order below is signed. The order does not preclude the debtor's (or the trustee's) filing a motion under Rule 9006 to enlarge the time for the debtor (or the trustee) to file a proof of the creditor's claim under Fed.R.Bankr.P. 3004. See In re Harding, 2006 WL 5738080 (Bankr. D. Md. Jan. 30, 2006). But Rule 9006 expressly bars the creditor itself from utilizing Rule 9006 to seek an enlargement of the time the creditor has under Rule 3002 to itself file a proof of its claim. Nor does this order bar the trustee's seeking to vacate this order and to withdraw her objection to the claim if the interests of the debtor and of the creditor body warrant letting the claim remain an allowed claim in light of the creditor's representations as to why that would be beneficial to the debtor.


Summaries of

In re Whittle

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Columbia
Oct 16, 2008
Case No. 07-00317 (Bankr. D.D.C. Oct. 16, 2008)
Case details for

In re Whittle

Case Details

Full title:IN RE JAMES E. WHITTLE Chapter 13, Debtor

Court:United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Columbia

Date published: Oct 16, 2008

Citations

Case No. 07-00317 (Bankr. D.D.C. Oct. 16, 2008)