From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re West

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas
Feb 26, 2020
No. 04-20-00105-CR (Tex. App. Feb. 26, 2020)

Opinion

No. 04-20-00105-CR

02-26-2020

IN RE Phillip WEST


MEMORANDUM OPINION

Original Mandamus Proceeding PER CURIAM Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice Beth Watkins, Justice PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2018CR13174, styled The State of Texas v. Phillip West, pending in the 399th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Frank J. Castro presiding.

Relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus in which he asserts the trial court has failed to rule on several motions in his underlying criminal case. Relator is represented by trial counsel below; therefore, he is not entitled to hybrid representation. Patrick v. State, 906 S.W.2d 481, 498 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995). The absence of a right to hybrid representation means relator's pro se mandamus petition will be treated as presenting nothing for this court's review. See id.; see also Gray v. Shipley, 877 S.W.2d 806, 806 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1994, orig. proceeding). Accordingly, relator's petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).

PER CURIAM Do not publish


Summaries of

In re West

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas
Feb 26, 2020
No. 04-20-00105-CR (Tex. App. Feb. 26, 2020)
Case details for

In re West

Case Details

Full title:IN RE Phillip WEST

Court:Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas

Date published: Feb 26, 2020

Citations

No. 04-20-00105-CR (Tex. App. Feb. 26, 2020)

Citing Cases

In re Willrich

Willrich is represented by trial counsel in the underlying proceeding; therefore, he is not entitled to…