From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Wellbutrin XL Antitrust Litig.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
May 11, 2012
NO. 08-2431 (direct) (E.D. Pa. May. 11, 2012)

Opinion

NO. 08-2431 (direct) NO. 08-2433 (indirect)

05-11-2012

In re: WELLBUTRIN XL ANTITRUST LITIGATION


CIVIL ACTION


ORDER

AND NOW, this 11th day of May, 2012, upon consideration of the Biovail Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 410 in 08-cv-2431; Docket No. 378 in 08-cv-2433), the GSK Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 411 in 08-cv-2431; Docket No. 379 in 08-cv-2433), the plaintiffs' consolidated opposition thereto, the defendants' replies in support, the plaintiffs' post-hearing submission, and following oral argument on March 20, 2012, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, for the reasons stated in a memorandum of law bearing today's date, that the defendants' motions are GRANTED IN PART.

The Court does not decide today the motions for summary judgment as to the settlement transaction. The motions are granted as to the patent infringement lawsuits and the citizen petition.

BY THE COURT:

____________________________

MARY A. McLAUGHLIN, J.


Summaries of

In re Wellbutrin XL Antitrust Litig.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
May 11, 2012
NO. 08-2431 (direct) (E.D. Pa. May. 11, 2012)
Case details for

In re Wellbutrin XL Antitrust Litig.

Case Details

Full title:In re: WELLBUTRIN XL ANTITRUST LITIGATION

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: May 11, 2012

Citations

NO. 08-2431 (direct) (E.D. Pa. May. 11, 2012)

Citing Cases

In re Wellbutrin XL Antitrust Litigation

GSK Stmt. ¶ 14; Pls.' Stmt. Opp. ¶ 14; In re Wellbutrin XL Antitrust Litig., 2012 WL 1657734 at *10–11…

P.R. Tel. Co. v. San Juan Cable Co.

Turning to OneLink's argument that Parker nullifies the "sham exception" under Noerr , PRTC rebuts that this…