Opinion
S282555
05-29-2024
WASHINGTON (RODERICK) ON H.C.
The petition for writ of habeas corpus has been read and considered. Petitioner contends, among other claims, that he is entitled to relief under the Racial Justice Act of 2020 (Pen. Code, § 745). In this respect, petitioner alleges that a judge, prosecutor, and his counsel “withheld discovery, fabricated sentence, and threatened” a witness and were complicit in a codefendant's alleged perjury; that he was denied the opportunity to represent himself, that his trial counsel failed to consult with him and made other errors in the course of representation; that there was insufficient disclosure that a witness had been arrested and/or convicted; and that he and a codefendant were “racially profiled” by the district attorney.
The petition fails to make a prima facie showing of entitlement to relief under the Racial Justice Act. (Pen. Code, § 1473, subd. (e).) The petition fails to allege particularized facts that adequately describe the alleged actions and how they reflected racial bias or animus, or to support the claim that defendant was charged, convicted, or sentenced in a more severe manner than similarly situated individuals of other races, ethnicities, or national origins. Nor does petitioner describe or attach supporting documentary evidence concerning racial bias or animus or the use of racially discriminatory language. (Pen. Code, § 745, subd. (a)(1)-(4); cf. In re Swain (1949) 34 Cal.2d 300, 304 [a petition for writ of habeas corpus must allege sufficient facts with particularity]; cf. also People v. Duvall (1995) 9 Cal.4th 464, 474 [a petition for writ of habeas corpus must include copies of reasonably available documentary evidence].)
The petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied.