From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Washington

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
Jul 9, 2019
NO. 03-19-00415-CV (Tex. App. Jul. 9, 2019)

Opinion

NO. 03-19-00415-CV

07-09-2019

In re Benjamin Washington


ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM COOKE COUNTY

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator Benjamin Washington has filed a document with the Court, which we have construed as a petition for writ of habeas corpus. See Surgitek, Bristol-Myers Corp. v. Abel, 997 S.W.2d 598, 601 (Tex. 1999) (courts look to substance of pleading rather than its caption or form to determine its nature); see also Tex. Gov't Code § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52.1. In his petition, Washington indicates that he seeks release from his confinement on pending charges, but he does not complain of any specific trial-court order. The intermediate courts of appeals have no original habeas corpus jurisdiction in criminal matters; our habeas corpus jurisdiction in criminal matters is appellate only. See Tex. Gov't Code § 22.221(d) (limiting jurisdiction to issue writs of habeas corpus to cases in which person is being restrained in our court of appeals district based on violation of order or judgment issued in civil case); In re Gonzalez, No. 03-17-00287-CV, 2017 WL 1832504, at *1 (Tex. App.—Austin May 5, 2017, orig. proceeding) (citing In re Ayers, 515 S.W.3d 356, 356 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] Apr. 14, 2016, orig. proceeding)). Original jurisdiction to grant a writ of habeas corpus in a criminal case is vested in the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, the district courts, the county courts, or a judge of those courts. Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 11.05; In re Ayers, 515 S.W.3d at 356; Ex Parte Hawkins, 885 S.W.2d 586, 588 (Tex. App.—El Paso 1994, orig. proceeding).

In addition, we note that Washington states that he is incarcerated in the Cooke County jail in Gainesville, Texas, and he raises various complaints against the judge of the 235th District Court. To the extent Washington seeks mandamus relief, we lack jurisdiction to consider these complaints. By statute, this Court has the authority to issue a writ of mandamus against "a judge of a district, statutory county, statutory probate county, or county court in the court of appeals district." See Tex. Gov't Code § 22.221(b) (emphasis added). This Court does not have mandamus jurisdiction over any court officials of Cooke County, which lies outside of our appellate district. See id. § 22.201(d) (listing counties that compose the Third Court of Appeals District).

Accordingly, we dismiss the petition for lack of jurisdiction.

/s/_________

Gisela D. Triana, Justice Before Justices Goodwin, Baker, and Triana Filed: July 9, 2019


Summaries of

In re Washington

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
Jul 9, 2019
NO. 03-19-00415-CV (Tex. App. Jul. 9, 2019)
Case details for

In re Washington

Case Details

Full title:In re Benjamin Washington

Court:TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

Date published: Jul 9, 2019

Citations

NO. 03-19-00415-CV (Tex. App. Jul. 9, 2019)

Citing Cases

In re Wilkins

As an intermediate appellate court, our habeas-corpus jurisdiction in criminal matters is appellate only. See…

In re Bird

The protective order was issued in a suit separate from the SAPCR by the Houston County court at law, which…