In re V.M.

Full title: In re V.M., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law. LOS ANGELES…

Court: California Court of Appeals, Second District, Eighth Division

Date published: Jan 21, 2011

No. B220976 (Cal. Ct. App. Jan. 21, 2011)

Opinion

Page 1014e

191 Cal.App.4th 1014e __ Cal.Rptr.3d__ In re V.M., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law. LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. V.M., Defendant and Appellant. B220976. California Court of Appeal, Second District, Eighth Division January 21, 2011

THE COURT.

GOOD CAUSE appearing therefor, the opinion filed on December 22, 2010 (191 Cal.App.4th 245;___Cal.Rptr.3d___), in the above-entitled matter is hereby modified as follows, and the petition for rehearing is DENIED:

1. In the first full paragraph on page 3 [191 Cal.App.4th 248, advance report, 2d full par., lines 4-6], the second full sentence is modified to read:

The court's assertion of dependency jurisdiction in this case was an abuse of discretion, and we reverse.

2. On page 9 [191 Cal.App.4th 253, advance report, 3d full par., lines 6-7], the last sentence in the first full paragraph is modified to read:

That is what the trial court should have done here.

3. On page 10 [191 Cal.App.4th 254, advance report, 1st par.], the disposition is modified and states in its entirety as follows:

The jurisdictional and dispositional orders are reversed as to V.M. The court is ordered to dismiss the petition as to V.M. forthwith unless new circumstances would justify a new finding of jurisdiction.

There is a change in the judgment.

Respondent's petition for rehearing is denied.