From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Village of Wappingers Falls v. Maul

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 16, 2003
306 A.D.2d 416 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

2002-03991

Argued May 29, 2003.

June 16, 2003.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Commissioner of the State of New York Office of Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities dated December 20, 2001, which, after a hearing, rejected the petitioner's objections to the establishment of a community residential facility for the disabled in the Village of Wappingers Falls.

Vergilis, Stenger, Roberts, Pergament Viglotti, Wappingers Falls, N.Y. (Karen P. MacNish and Louis J. Viglotti of counsel), for petitioner.

Eliot Spitzer, Attorney-General, New York, N.Y. (Michael S. Belohlavek and Ann P. Zybert of counsel), for respondents.

Before: ANITA R. FLORIO, J.P., SONDRA MILLER, LEO F. McGINITY, THOMAS A. ADAMS, JJ.


DECISION JUDGMENT

ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, the petition is denied, and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the petitioner's contention, the determination of the Commissioner of the State of New York Office of Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities was supported by substantial evidence. The petitioner failed to demonstrate that the establishment of the subject community residential facility would result in an overconcentration of the same or similar facilities so as to substantially alter the nature and character of the area (see Mental Hygiene Law § 41.34[c]; Matter of Jennings v. New York State Off. of Mental Health, 90 N.Y.2d 227; Matter of Town of Kent v. Maul, 262 A.D.2d 495; Matter of Town of Oyster Bay v. Maul, 231 A.D.2d 580; Matter of Town of Southeast v. Maul, 225 A.D.2d 784; Matter of Cedar Grove Civic Homeowners Assn. v. Maul, 225 A.D.2d 618).

FLORIO, J.P., S. MILLER, McGINITY and ADAMS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Village of Wappingers Falls v. Maul

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 16, 2003
306 A.D.2d 416 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

Village of Wappingers Falls v. Maul

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF VILLAGE OF WAPPINGERS FALLS, petitioner, v. THOMAS A…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 16, 2003

Citations

306 A.D.2d 416 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
762 N.Y.S.2d 250

Citing Cases

Vill. of Port Chester v. Delaney

Contrary to the Village's contention, the Acting Commissioner's determination was supported by substantial…

Port Chester v. Ayotte

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, the petition is denied, and the proceeding is dismissed on the…