From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Vegas Amusement, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Dec 11, 2012
492 F. App'x 115 (Fed. Cir. 2012)

Opinion

2012-1279

12-11-2012

IN RE VEGAS AMUSEMENT, INC.

MICHAEL E. DERGOSITS, Dergosits & Noah, LLP, of San Francisco, California, argued for the appellant. With him on the brief was IGOR SHOIKET. FARHEENA Y. RASHEED, Associate Solicitor, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, of Alexandria, Virginia, argued for appellee. With him on the brief were RAYMOND T. CHEN, Solicitor, and LYNNE E. PETTIGREW, Associate Solicitor.


NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.


(Reexamination No. 90/011,023)

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences.

JUDGMENT

MICHAEL E. DERGOSITS, Dergosits & Noah, LLP, of San Francisco, California, argued for the appellant. With him on the brief was IGOR SHOIKET.

FARHEENA Y. RASHEED, Associate Solicitor, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, of Alexandria, Virginia, argued for appellee. With him on the brief were RAYMOND T. CHEN, Solicitor, and LYNNE E. PETTIGREW, Associate Solicitor. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (DYK, CLEVENGER, and PROST, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

____________________________

Jan Horbaly

Clerk


Summaries of

In re Vegas Amusement, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Dec 11, 2012
492 F. App'x 115 (Fed. Cir. 2012)
Case details for

In re Vegas Amusement, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:IN RE VEGAS AMUSEMENT, INC.

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Dec 11, 2012

Citations

492 F. App'x 115 (Fed. Cir. 2012)