From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re United Last Co.

United States District Court, D. Massachusetts
Oct 22, 1947
7 F.R.D. 759 (D. Mass. 1947)

Opinion

         Proceeding in the matter of the motion of Fred W. Mears Heel Company, Inc., to quash subpoena duces tecum in grand jury proceedings.

         Order in accordance with opinion.

         

          John L. Hall, Claude R. Branch, Charles P. Curtis, Jr., and John B. Reigeluth (all of Choate, Hall & Stewart), of Boston, Mass., for movant.

         John F. Sonnett, Asst. Atty. Gen., of Washington D. C., Grant W. Kelleher, Sp. Asst. to Atty. Gen., and C. Worth Rowley, Jr., Alfred Karsted, and Edward M. Feeney, Sp. Attys., all of Boston, Mass., for the United States.


          SWEENEY, District Judge.

         The subpoena duces tecum in this case is to be modified so that the period of time covered will be from January 1, 1937, to January 1, 1942, which is the last date named in the subpoena. This modification will have the effect of limiting the various papers set forth in the subpoena to those referring to the acquisition of the stock of the Maple Wood Heel Company, and the subpoena is modified to that effect. See this Court's decision today in Re United Shoe Machinery Corporation, 7 F.Supp. 756.


Summaries of

In re United Last Co.

United States District Court, D. Massachusetts
Oct 22, 1947
7 F.R.D. 759 (D. Mass. 1947)
Case details for

In re United Last Co.

Case Details

Full title:In re UNITED LAST CO.

Court:United States District Court, D. Massachusetts

Date published: Oct 22, 1947

Citations

7 F.R.D. 759 (D. Mass. 1947)

Citing Cases

In re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum, Etc.

The courts have sustained subpoenas duces tecum covering long periods of time: In re United Shoe Machinery…

Application of Linen Supply Cos.

In re Investigations of World Arrangements, D.C.D.C., 1952, 13 F.R.D. 280; In re United Shoe Machinery Corp.,…