From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Umans Bleachery

United States District Court, D. New Jersey
Aug 27, 1940
34 F. Supp. 694 (D.N.J. 1940)

Opinion

No. 29354.

August 27, 1940.

Peter Hofstra, of Paterson, N.J. (Joseph V. Fumagalli, of Paterson, N.J., of counsel), for petitioner Van Vlaanderen Mach. Co.

William Harris, of Newark, N.J. (Harry Pechenik, of Newark, N.J., of counsel), for trustee.

Charles A. Malloy and Herman Ringle, both of Trenton, N.J., for State of New Jersey Unemployment Compensation Commission, amicus curiæ.


In Bankruptcy. Proceeding in the matter of Umans Bleachery, Inc., bankrupt, wherein the Van Vlaanderen Machine Company filed a petition, and wherein question arose concerning whether realty owned by bankrupt, and sold at public sale subject to existing taxes and assessments, was subject to claim of state of New Jersey for unpaid unemployment compensation contributions.

Judgment in accordance with opinion.


The question certified by the Referee is: "Did the Referee err in deciding that where property was sold subject to existing taxes and assessments, it was sold subject to claim of the State of New Jersey for Unpaid Unemployment Compensation contributions?"

The Referee did err.

Subdivision (b) of 43:21-14, R.S. of N.J. 1937, amended, Chapter 309, P.L. 1939, N.J.S.A. 43:21-14, reads: "The contributions, penalties, and interest due from any employer under the provisions of this chapter, from the time they shall be due, shall be a personal debt of the employer to the State of New Jersey, recoverable in any court of competent jurisdiction in an action at law in the name of the State of New Jersey. Such debt, whether sued upon or not, shall be a first lien on all property of the debtor except as against an innocent purchaser for value in the usual course of business and without notice thereof, and shall have preference in any distribution of the assets of the employer, whether in bankruptcy, insolvency or otherwise. * * *"

A tax in its essential characteristics is not a debt, nor in the nature of a debt. It is an impost levied by authority of government upon its citizens or subjects for the support of the state. Schradin v. Harry W. Bealer Co. et al., 114 N.J. Eq. 459, 168 A. 854, affirmed, 117 N.J. Eq. 443, 176 A. 321; Brunner v. Morrison, 123 N.J. Eq. 224, 196 A. 716.

It is a fundamental principle of statutory construction that a legislature is presumed to be familiar with the common law and statutes of its own state (Ross v. Miller, 115 N.J.L. 61, 178 A. 771), and common words are to be taken in their ordinary significance. Evening Journal Ass'n v. State Board of Assessors, 47 N.J.L. 36, 54 Am.Rep. 114; Storage Co. v. Assessors, 56 N.J.L. 389, 29 A. 160; Hackensack Trust Co. v. City of Hackensack, 116 N.J.L. 343, 184 A. 408; State Board of Examiners v. Plager, 118 N.J.L. 434, 193 A. 698.

This Court finds that the legislature, when it used the word "Debt", did so with full knowledge that a tax, in its essential characteristics, is not a debt nor in the nature of a debt, and therefore the public. sale of the real estate owned by the bankrupt, subject to existing taxes, assessments and a certain identified mortgage, was not subject to a claim of the State of New Jersey for unpaid unemployment compensation contributions.

An order in accordance with the foregoing should be presented.


Summaries of

In re Umans Bleachery

United States District Court, D. New Jersey
Aug 27, 1940
34 F. Supp. 694 (D.N.J. 1940)
Case details for

In re Umans Bleachery

Case Details

Full title:In re UMANS BLEACHERY, Inc

Court:United States District Court, D. New Jersey

Date published: Aug 27, 1940

Citations

34 F. Supp. 694 (D.N.J. 1940)

Citing Cases

In re Wm. Akers, Jr., Co.

Proceeding in the matter of Umans Bleachery, Inc., bankrupt, by the State of New Jersey, Unemployment…

In re Stodden

Id. at 135. The following three cases were each overruled by In re Wm. Akers, Jr., Co., Inc., 121 F.2d 846…