Opinion
23-md-03084-CRB
01-03-2024
IN RE UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., PASSENGER SEXUAL ASSAULT LITIGATION This Relates To ALL ACTIONS
ORDER DENYING ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONSIDER WHETHER ANOTHER PARTY'S MATERIAL SHOULD BE SEALED
RE: DKT. NO. 160
CHARLES R. BREYER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
In connection with their Motion to Enforce PTO No. 2 and to Compel Defendants to Produce Litigation Hold Information, Plaintiffs filed an Administrative Motion to Consider Whether Another Party's Material Should Be Filed Under Seal. Dkt. No. 160. In the motion, Plaintiffs take no position on whether the materials in question should be sealed. Defendants-the designating parties-did not file a statement or declaration in support of sealing as required by Local Rule 79-5(f)(3). The motion is therefore denied.
IT IS SO ORDERED.