From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Uber Techs. Inc., Passenger Sexual Assault Litig.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Feb 16, 2024
3:23-MD-3084-CRB (N.D. Cal. Feb. 16, 2024)

Opinion

3:23-MD-3084-CRB

02-16-2024

IN RE UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., PASSENGER SEXUAL ASSAULT LITIGATION This Document Relates to: ALL ACTIONS


[PROPOSED] ORDER AS MODIFIED DENYING PLAINTIFFS' ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO SHORTEN TIME

HON. LISA J. CISNEROS UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Having considered Plaintiffs' Administrative Motion to Shorten Time for Uber's Response to Motion to Enforce PTO No. 5 Related to Government Investigation Documents, (the “Motion”), all other papers and evidence submitted in support and opposition, the pertinent pleadings and papers on file in this action, and the arguments of counsel, and all other matters presented to the Court, it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion is DENIED. Uber's Response to the Motion is due by February 23, 2024. The Court sets a hearing for the matter on February 29, 2024, at 2:30 p.m. via Zoom.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

In re Uber Techs. Inc., Passenger Sexual Assault Litig.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Feb 16, 2024
3:23-MD-3084-CRB (N.D. Cal. Feb. 16, 2024)
Case details for

In re Uber Techs. Inc., Passenger Sexual Assault Litig.

Case Details

Full title:IN RE UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., PASSENGER SEXUAL ASSAULT LITIGATION This…

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Feb 16, 2024

Citations

3:23-MD-3084-CRB (N.D. Cal. Feb. 16, 2024)