From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Tutt

Supreme Court of New Jersey
May 19, 2000
750 A.2d 772 (N.J. 2000)

Opinion

May 19, 2000.


ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision concluding that JAMES P. TUTT of NEWARK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1985, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence), RPC 1.4 (a) (failure to communicate), RPC 1.4 (b) (failure to explain a matter to a client), RPC 1.15 (b) (failure to promptly deliver funds or property) and RPC 8.1 (b) (failure to cooperate with disciplinary authorities), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that JAMES P. TUTT is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent's file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.


Summaries of

In re Tutt

Supreme Court of New Jersey
May 19, 2000
750 A.2d 772 (N.J. 2000)
Case details for

In re Tutt

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF JAMES P. TUTT, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: May 19, 2000

Citations

750 A.2d 772 (N.J. 2000)
750 A.2d 772

Citing Cases

In re John

See, e.g., In the Matter of Craig Altman, DRB 99-133 (June 17, 1999) (admonition for attorney who signed a…