From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Tresin J.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Mar 13, 2019
331 Conn. 909 (Conn. 2019)

Opinion

03-13-2019

IN RE TRESIN J.

David J. Reich, assigned counsel, in support of the petition. Michael Besso, assistant attorney general, in opposition.


The petition by the respondent father for certification to appeal from the Appellate Court, 187 Conn.App. 804, ___ A.3d ___, is granted, limited to the following issue:

"Did the Appellate Court correctly conclude that the trial court, which terminated the respondent father's parental rights based on the absence of an ongoing parent child relationship, was not required to apply the infancy exception recognized in In re Carla C., 167 Conn.App. 248, 143 A.3d 677 (2016)?"

D'AURIA and MULLINS, Js., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.


Summaries of

In re Tresin J.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Mar 13, 2019
331 Conn. 909 (Conn. 2019)
Case details for

In re Tresin J.

Case Details

Full title:IN RE TRESIN J.

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Date published: Mar 13, 2019

Citations

331 Conn. 909 (Conn. 2019)
202 A.3d 1022

Citing Cases

In re Tresin J.

We originally granted the respondent's petition for certification, limited to the following issue: "Did the…