From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Tootle

Supreme Court of South Carolina
Dec 1, 1998
510 S.E.2d 214 (S.C. 1998)

Opinion

December 1, 1998.


ORDER

The Office of Disciplinary Counsel has filed a petition asking the Court to place respondent on interim suspension pursuant to Rule 17, RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR, because he pled guilty to a serious crime. The petition also seeks appointment of an attorney to protect the interests of respondent's clients pursuant to Rule 31, RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR.

IT IS ORDERED that the petition is granted and respondent is suspended from the practice of law in this State until further order of this Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that James A. Grimsley, III, Esquire, is appointed to assume responsibility for respondent's client files, trust account(s), escrow account(s), operating accounts(s), and any other law office accounts respondent may maintain. Mr. Grimsley shall take action as required by Rule 31, RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR, to protect the interests of respondent's clients. Mr. Grimsley may make disbursements from respondent's trust account(s), escrow account(s), operating account(s), and any other law office accounts respondent may maintain that are necessary to effectuate this appointment.

This Order, when served on any bank or other financial institution maintaining trust, escrow and/or operating account(s) of respondent, shall serve as an injunction to prevent respondent from making withdrawals from the account(s) and shall further serve as notice to the bank or other financial institution that James A. Grimsley, III, Esquire, has been duly appointed by this Court.

/s/ Ernest A. Finney, Jr., C.J. FOR THE COURT


Summaries of

In re Tootle

Supreme Court of South Carolina
Dec 1, 1998
510 S.E.2d 214 (S.C. 1998)
Case details for

In re Tootle

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Kenneth L. TOOTLE, Respondent

Court:Supreme Court of South Carolina

Date published: Dec 1, 1998

Citations

510 S.E.2d 214 (S.C. 1998)
510 S.E.2d 214