In re TMX Fin. of Tex., Inc.

Full title: In re TMX Finance of Texas, Inc; TitleMax of Texas, Inc.; and TMX Finance…

Court: COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

Date published: Dec 16, 2014

Cause number: 01-14-00964-CV (Tex. App. Dec. 16, 2014)

Opinion

Cause number: 01-14-00964-CV

12-16-2014

In re TMX Finance of Texas, Inc; TitleMax of Texas, Inc.; and TMX Finance LLC

Evelyn V. Keyes

ORDER ON MOTION

Type of motions: Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Response to Mandamus Petition Parties filing motions: Real Parties in Interest Document to be filed: Response Ordered that motion is:

[v] Granted

If document is to be filed, document due: December 16, 2014

[ ] Denied



[ ] Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)



[v] Other: __________



Although relators did not include the reporter's record because they stated in their verification that no evidentiary testimony or exhibits were submitted at the hearing, the RPIs state that this record is needed for resolution of the petition and that the parties have requested it on an expedited basis and expected it early last week. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.4(e), 52.7(a)(2). Accordingly, the real parties in interests' motion for a 1-week extension of time to file a response to the mandamus petition is granted until December 16, 2014. See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.3(a)(2), 10.5(b)(1).

Judge's signature: /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes

[×] Acting individually
Panel consists of __________ Date: December 16, 2014 November 7, 2008 Revision