From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re the Interest of J.A.R., J.L.R

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Sep 23, 1982
419 So. 2d 780 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

Opinion

No. AK-385.

September 23, 1982.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Okaloosa County, Michael Jones, J.

James H. DeAtley, Gulf Breeze, for appellant Lenette Ralston.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and Eric J. Taylor, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee Florida Dept. of Health and Rehabilitative Services.


This is an appeal from an order of the circuit court adjudicating two of appellant's minor children dependents. The sole issue which warrants summary discussion pertains to appellant's contention that the court erred in denying her motion to suppress photographs which were seized during a search conducted pursuant to a search warrant for a handgun. The basis of that denial was the court's conclusion that Florida's constitutionally embodied exclusionary rule does not apply in dependency proceedings. Although we recognize that the issue raised is one of first impression, it need not be resolved herein because we find that the search of which appellant complains was not an unreasonable one requiring invocation of the rule, if applicable. Accordingly, the order is affirmed.

McCORD, BOOTH and WENTWORTH, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

In re the Interest of J.A.R., J.L.R

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Sep 23, 1982
419 So. 2d 780 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)
Case details for

In re the Interest of J.A.R., J.L.R

Case Details

Full title:IN RE THE INTEREST OF J.A.R. AND J.L.R., CHILDREN. LENETTE RALSTON…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Sep 23, 1982

Citations

419 So. 2d 780 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

Citing Cases

M.W. v. Dept. of Health Rehab. Serv

Technical rules of evidence which prevent the court from considering critical evidence are not favored, see,…