From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Oct 31, 2016
03-MDL-1570 (GBD) (SN) (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 31, 2016)

Opinion

03-MDL-1570 (GBD) (SN)

10-31-2016

IN RE: TERRORIST ATTACKS ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2001


MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER

:

Before this Court is Magistrate Judge Netburn's October 12, 2016 Report and Recommendation ("Report," ECF No. 3358) recommending that this Court award a default judgment against Defendants in the amount of $1,759,715,035 and recommending that plaintiffs' claims for punitive damages be denied without prejudice to a future application. This Court adopts the Report in its entirety.

Plaintiffs in Hoglan v. Islamic Republic of Iran, 11-cv-7550 (GBD) (SN), one of numerous related actions filed on behalf of the estates and family members of the victims of the September 11, 2001 attacks sought entry of default judgment awarding them compensatory and punitive damages against the Islamic Republic of Iran, Ayatollah Ali Hoseini Khamenei, Hezbollah, and other Iranian individuals and entities. On August 31, 2015, this Court granted Plaintiffs' motion for entry of default, entered judgment on liability against Defendants, (ECF No. 3023), and referred this case to Magistrate Judge Maas for an inquest on damages, (ECF No. 3029). Plaintiffs timely filed inquest papers. (ECF Nos. 3194.) Defendants did not respond. (See id.) On October 4, 2016, the case was transferred to Magistrate Judge Netburn for calculation of damages.

I. LEGAL STANDARD

This Court may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings set forth in the Report. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). When no party files objections to a Report, the Court may adopt the Report if "there is no clear error on the face of the record." Adee Motor Cars, LLC v. Amato, 388 F. Supp. 2d 250, 253 (S.D.N.Y. 2005) (quoting Nelson v. Smith, 618 F. Supp. 1186, 1189 (S.D.N.Y. 1985)); Wilds v. United Parcel Service, Inc., 262 F. Supp. 2d 163, 169 (S.D.N.Y. 2003) ("To accept the report and recommendation of a magistrate, to which no timely objection has been made, a district court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record" (internal citations and quotation marks omitted)).

Magistrate Judge Netburn advised the parties that failure to file timely objections to the Report would constitute a waiver of those objections on appeal. (Report at 21-22); see also 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). As of the date of this Order, no objection to the Report has been filed. The Report contains no clear error of law and is adopted by this Court.

III. CONCLUSION

For the reasons stated in Magistrate Judge Netburn's October 12, 2016 Report and Recommendation at ECF No. 3358, judgment is therefore entered against Defendants in the amount of $1,759,715,035. Plaintiffs receiving solatium damages and the Estates receiving pain and suffering damages shall be awarded prejudgment interest on those damages from September 11, 2001 to the date of judgment at the rate of 4.96 percent per annum, compounded annually. Plaintiffs' claims for punitive damages are denied without prejudice. The parties are ordered to submit any further briefing regarding punitive damages to Magistrate Judge Netburn. Dated: New York, New York

October 31, 2016

SO ORDERED.

/s/_________

GEORGE B. DANIELS

United States District Judge


Summaries of

In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Oct 31, 2016
03-MDL-1570 (GBD) (SN) (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 31, 2016)
Case details for

In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001

Case Details

Full title:IN RE: TERRORIST ATTACKS ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2001

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Oct 31, 2016

Citations

03-MDL-1570 (GBD) (SN) (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 31, 2016)