In re Tenberg

Full title: IN RE ARLEN RAY TENBERG

Court: Court of Appeals of Texas, Thirteenth District, Corpus Christi — Edinburg

Date published: Jan 30, 2009

No. 13-09-00041-CR (Tex. App. Jan. 30, 2009)

Opinion

No. 13-09-00041-CR

Opinion delivered and filed January 30, 2009. DO NOT PUBLISH. See Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

Before Justices RODRIGUEZ, GARZA, and VELA.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM Memorandum Opinion.[fn1] [fn1] See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(d) ("When denying relief, the court may hand down an opinion but is not required to do so."); Tex. R. App. P. 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and memorandum opinions).

Relator, Arlen Ray Tenberg, pro se, filed a petition for writ of mandamus in the above cause on January 23, 2009.² The Court, having examined and fully considered the petition for writ of mandamus, is of the opinion that relator has not shown himself entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).

2 Relator also filed a "motion for leave" to file this petition for writ of mandamus. We dismiss relator's motion for leave to file the petition for writ of mandamus as moot because the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure no longer require the relator to file a motion for leave in an original proceeding. See generally Tex. R. App. P. 52 cmt.