In re Telescopes Antitrust Litig.

Full title: In re Telescopes Antitrust Litigation

Court: United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Aug 18, 2023

20-cv-03639-EJD (N.D. Cal. Aug. 18, 2023)

Opinion

20-cv-03639-EJD 20-cv-03642-EJD

08-18-2023

In re Telescopes Antitrust Litigation

Attorneys for Plaintiffs: For Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs: Ronald Fisher For Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs: Adam Zapala Attorney for Defendants: Christopher Frost

VIRGINIA K. DEMARCHI JUDGE

Attorneys for Plaintiffs: For Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs: Ronald Fisher

For Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs: Adam Zapala

Attorney for Defendants: Christopher Frost

CIVIL MINUTE ORDER

VIRGINIA K. DEMARCHI JUDGE

PROCEEDINGS

Telephonic Proceeding for Mid-Deposition Dispute held.

During a break in the deposition of a witness, the parties requested the Court's guidance regarding the defending attorney's manner of stating objections to the form of the question. The Court suggested that the parties limit such objections to a statement that the party “objects to the form of the question,” or to a brief statement of the basis, such as “objection, vague and ambiguous.”

The Court did not make any findings or issue any orders.