Opinion
2014-1179
09-17-2014
IN RE TECHSHELL, INC.
ROBERT B. DULANEY, III, Smith Risley Tempel Santos, of Atlanta, Georgia, argued for appellant. On the brief was SCOTT A. HORSTEMEYER, Thomas | Horstemeyer LLP, of Atlanta, Georgia. Of counsel were NORMAN A. CRAIN and DAN R. GRESHAM. MEREDITH H. SCHOENFELD, Associate Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, of Alexandria, Virginia, argued for intervenor. With her on the brief were NATHAN K. KELLEY, Solicitor, and MONICA B. LATEEF, Associate Solicitor.
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Reexamination No. 95/001,767.
JUDGMENT
ROBERT B. DULANEY, III, Smith Risley Tempel Santos, of Atlanta, Georgia, argued for appellant. On the brief was SCOTT A. HORSTEMEYER, Thomas | Horstemeyer LLP, of Atlanta, Georgia. Of counsel were NORMAN A. CRAIN and DAN R. GRESHAM. MEREDITH H. SCHOENFELD, Associate Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, of Alexandria, Virginia, argued for intervenor. With her on the brief were NATHAN K. KELLEY, Solicitor, and MONICA B. LATEEF, Associate Solicitor. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, TARANTO and HUGHES, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
September 17, 2014
Date
/s/ Daniel E. O'Toole
Daniel E. O'Toole
Clerk of Court