From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Tarkington

Court of Appeals of Texas, Third District, Austin
Jul 13, 2023
No. 03-23-00305-CV (Tex. App. Jul. 13, 2023)

Opinion

03-23-00305-CV

07-13-2023

In re Patrick Earl Tarkington


ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM COMAL COUNTY

Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Baker and Smith.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

EDWARD SMITH, JUSTICE.

Relator has filed a petition for writ of mandamus complaining of the trial court's failure to set for hearing his plea to the jurisdiction. Having reviewed the petition and the record provided, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. See Tex.R.App.P. 52.8(a); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52.7(a); In re Smith, No. 03-14-00478-CV, 2014 WL 4079922, at *2 (Tex. App.-Austin Aug. 13, 2014, orig. proceeding) (denying mandamus relief when relator failed to provide sufficient record from which to evaluate claim for mandamus relief); In re Halley, No. 03-15-00310-CV, 2015 WL 4448831, at *2 (Tex. App.-Austin July 14, 2015) (orig. proceeding) (concluding that a six-month delay did not constitute an unreasonable length of time under "failure to rule" analysis).


Summaries of

In re Tarkington

Court of Appeals of Texas, Third District, Austin
Jul 13, 2023
No. 03-23-00305-CV (Tex. App. Jul. 13, 2023)
Case details for

In re Tarkington

Case Details

Full title:In re Patrick Earl Tarkington

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Third District, Austin

Date published: Jul 13, 2023

Citations

No. 03-23-00305-CV (Tex. App. Jul. 13, 2023)