From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Tannenbaum

Court of Appeal of California, First District, Division One
Jan 16, 1953
115 Cal.App.2d 394 (Cal. Ct. App. 1953)

Opinion

Docket Nos. 2900, 2901, 15673, 15674.

January 16, 1953.

PROCEEDINGS in habeas corpus to secure release from custody, and proceedings in prohibition. Writs denied.

John R. Golden for Petitioner Joseph Tannenbaum.

Leslie C. Gillen and Sol A. Abrams for Petitioner Carl E. Brown.


THE COURT.

The petitions for writs of habeas corpus are denied.

The court is of the opinion that the rule of People v. Talle, 111 Cal.App.2d 650 [ 245 P.2d 633], applying Statutes of 1871, page 319, was not here violated. (See, generally, In re Lemon, 15 Cal.App.2d 82 [ 59 P.2d 213]; United States v. Price, 163 F. 904.) [1] We are further of the view that the testimony of an accomplice is sufficient upon which to indict as it is to hold to answer. ( People v. McRae, 31 Cal.2d 184 [ 187 P.2d 741].) The other points raised do not necessitate discussion. The petitions for writs of prohibition are denied.


Summaries of

In re Tannenbaum

Court of Appeal of California, First District, Division One
Jan 16, 1953
115 Cal.App.2d 394 (Cal. Ct. App. 1953)
Case details for

In re Tannenbaum

Case Details

Full title:In re JOSEPH TANNENBAUM, on Habeas Corpus. In re CARL E. BROWN, on Habeas…

Court:Court of Appeal of California, First District, Division One

Date published: Jan 16, 1953

Citations

115 Cal.App.2d 394 (Cal. Ct. App. 1953)
252 P.2d 54

Citing Cases

People v. Singer

It is settled that in determining that there is probable cause to hold a defendant, a magistrate is not bound…

State v. Wyatt

It is settled that in determining that there is probable cause to hold a defendant, a magistrate is not bound…