From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Summers

Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
Aug 30, 2017
NO. 09-17-00292-CR (Tex. App. Aug. 30, 2017)

Opinion

NO. 09-17-00292-CR

08-30-2017

IN RE ANTHONY LEON SUMMERS


Original Proceeding 260th District Court of Orange County, Texas
Trial Cause No. D170078-R

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Anthony Leon Summers filed a pro se petition for writ of mandamus in this Court. See Tex. Gov't Code Ann. § 22.221 (West 2004); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. Summers complains that the trial court has not addressed pro se motions filed in a criminal case in which Summers is represented by counsel. "[A] trial court is free to disregard any pro se motions presented by a defendant who is represented by counsel." Robinson v. State, 240 S.W.3d 919, 922 (Tex. Crim. App. 2007). A trial court does not abuse its discretion by failing to rule on pro se motions in a criminal proceeding in which the defendant is represented by counsel. In re Kellum, 307 S.W.3d 336, 336 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2009, orig. proceeding). Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied.

PETITION DENIED.

PER CURIAM Submitted on August 29, 2017
Opinion Delivered August 30, 2017
Do Not Publish Before McKeithen, C.J., Horton and Johnson, JJ.


Summaries of

In re Summers

Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
Aug 30, 2017
NO. 09-17-00292-CR (Tex. App. Aug. 30, 2017)
Case details for

In re Summers

Case Details

Full title:IN RE ANTHONY LEON SUMMERS

Court:Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

Date published: Aug 30, 2017

Citations

NO. 09-17-00292-CR (Tex. App. Aug. 30, 2017)