From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Sullivan

Supreme Court of South Dakota
Mar 17, 1936
265 N.W. 601 (S.D. 1936)

Opinion

File No. 7618.

Opinion filed March 17, 1936.

Attorney and Client.

Disbarred attorney who had appeared as attorney for defendant in trial of a cause in circuit court, willfully and without justifiable cause, was punishable for contempt of court for violation of order of disbarment.

In the matter of the disbarment of E.E. Sullivan. Original proceeding requiring E.E. Sullivan to show cause why he should not be punished for contempt for practicing law after disbarment.

Judgment committing E.E. Sullivan to county jail for contempt of court.

Walter Conway, Atty. Gen., for the State.

George J. Danforth, of Sioux Falls, for Accused.


E.E. Sullivan of Sioux Falls, S.D., was by an order entered the 8th day of February, 1934, disbarred from the practice of law in this state, and the license of said Sullivan to practice law was in all things canceled and revoked, and his name stricken from the roll of attorneys. Personal service of the order of disbarment was admitted by the said Sullivan on the 5th day of March, 1934. On November 13, 1935, an appeal was filed in this court in the case of State of South Dakota v. J.A. Johnson, 64 S.D. 162, 265 N.W. 599. It was disclosed by the record on appeal in that case that the above-named E.E. Sullivan had appeared as an attorney for the defendant, J.A. Johnson, in the circuit court of Aurora county in the trial in the case, which commenced on the 6th day of September, 1934. See State v. Johnson 64 S.D. 162, 265 N.W. 599. On February 20, 1936, an order was served on the said E.E. Sullivan, directing him to appear before this court at a time fixed to show cause why he should not be held in contempt of court for a violation of the order of disbarment referred to above. At the time fixed Mr. Sullivan did appear with counsel, and did admit the violation of the said order in that he appeared as an attorney in the trial of the case of State of South Dakota v. Johnson, as disclosed by the record in that case.

The violation of the order of disbarment stands admitted. This court has no recourse except to punish for contempt. We are of the opinion that the violation of the order was a willful violation and without any justifiable excuse. It is our judgment that the above-named E.E. Sullivan should be committed to the county jail of Minnehaha county, S.D., for a period of thirty days for the willful violation of the order of disbarment. Formal judgment will be entered accordingly.

All the Judges concur.


Summaries of

In re Sullivan

Supreme Court of South Dakota
Mar 17, 1936
265 N.W. 601 (S.D. 1936)
Case details for

In re Sullivan

Case Details

Full title:In Re SULLIVAN

Court:Supreme Court of South Dakota

Date published: Mar 17, 1936

Citations

265 N.W. 601 (S.D. 1936)
265 N.W. 601