Opinion
No. 05-10-01444-CV
Opinion issued December 7, 2010.
Original Proceeding from the Criminal District Court No. 2, Dallas County, Texas, Trial Court Cause No. F85-88-500-I.
Before Justices MORRIS, LANG, and MYERS.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Relator contends the trial court violated a ministerial duty by not ruling on his motion to require the prosecution to produce biological evidence. The facts and issues are well known to the parties, so we need not recount them herein. Based on the record before us, we conclude relator has not shown he is entitled to the relief requested. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a); State of Texas ex rel. Hill v. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Dist., 67 S.W.3d 177, 180-81 (Tex. Crim. App. 2001); State of Tex. ex rel. Hill v. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Dist., 34 S.W.3d 924, 927 (Tex. Crim. App. 2001). Accordingly, we DENY relator's petition for writ of mandamus.