From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Stephens

Supreme Court of Louisiana
Nov 18, 1994
645 So. 2d 1133 (La. 1994)

Summary

finding to be a violation of Rules 4.1 and 8.4(c) an attorney's notarization and filing of a forged affidavit

Summary of this case from In re Sealed Appellant

Opinion

No. 94-B-1924.

November 18, 1994.

In Re: Report of Disciplinary Board; Discplinary [Disciplinary] Board No. 93-DB-029.


November 18, 1994

Suspension ordered. See per curiam.

JLD

PFC

JCW

HTL

PH

CDK

BJJ

MARCUS, J. — not on panel.

Disciplinary Proceedings


Respondent, Eddie L. Stephens, was formally charged with failing to keep his client informed and notarizing a forged affidavit before filing it into the court record, in violation of Rules 1.1(a), 1.3, 1.4, 3.3(a), 3.4(b), 4.1(a) and (b): and 8.4(a), (b), (c), and (d).

The facts developed at the hearing indicated that respondent was retained to defend the St. Michael's Spiritual Temple of Faith of Baton Rouge in connection with a suit for non-payment of a loan. After filing an answer in the suit, respondent had very little contact with his client. Later in the litigation, plaintiff filed a motion for summary judgment. In order to create a material issue of fact, respondent notarized and caused to be filed into the civil litigation an affidavit purporting to be the sworn statement of the Reverend Dorothy Powell. Shortly after formal charges were filed, respondent began serving a one-year suspension for an unrelated disciplinary violation involving the commingling and conversion of client funds.

In light of the above evidence, the hearing committee recommended that respondent be suspended for one year and one day, while the disciplinary board recommended that respondent be suspended for 18 months.

Upon review of the record of the disciplinary board's findings and recommendations, and the record filed herein, it is the decision of the court that the disciplinary board's recommendations be adopted.

Accordingly, it is ordered that Eddie L. Stephens be suspended from the practice of law for a period of 18 months to run consecutively from the suspension he began serving on October 1, 1993 in the matter of In Re: Eddie L. Stephens, Supreme Court No. 93-B-0939. All costs of this proceeding are assessed to respondent, and reinstatement is conditioned upon their payment.

SUSPENSION ORDERED.


Summaries of

In re Stephens

Supreme Court of Louisiana
Nov 18, 1994
645 So. 2d 1133 (La. 1994)

finding to be a violation of Rules 4.1 and 8.4(c) an attorney's notarization and filing of a forged affidavit

Summary of this case from In re Sealed Appellant
Case details for

In re Stephens

Case Details

Full title:IN RE: EDDIE L. STEPHENS

Court:Supreme Court of Louisiana

Date published: Nov 18, 1994

Citations

645 So. 2d 1133 (La. 1994)

Citing Cases

In re Stephens

The charges allege violations of Rules 1.1(a) (lack of competence), 1.3 (lack of due diligence), 1.4 (failure…

In re Warner

The board further recommended that respondent be assessed with all costs and expenses of these proceedings,…