From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re State Farm Mutual Auto Ins. Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas
Oct 8, 2003
No. 05-03-01469-CV (Tex. App. Oct. 8, 2003)

Opinion

No. 05-03-01469-CV.

Opinion issued October 8, 2003.

Original Proceeding from the 191st Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas, Trial Court Cause No. 03-01092-J.

Writ of Mandamus Denied.

Before Justices MORRIS, FITZGERALD, and LANG.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Relator contends the trial judge erred in ordering relator to respond to certain interrogatories and requests for production. The facts of this original proceeding are known to the parties so we do not recite them here. Further, because all dispositive issues are clearly settled in law, we issue this memorandum opinion pursuant to rule 52.8(d) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See Tex.R.App.P. 52.8(d). Based on the record presented, we conclude the relator has failed to show itself entitled to the relief requested. Accordingly, relator's motion for emergency stay and petition for writ of mandamus are DENIED. See Tex.R.App.P. 52.8(a); Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 839-842 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding).

Morris, J., dissents from the denial of relator's motion for emergency stay and, pursuant to appellate rule 52.8(b)(1), would request a response.


Summaries of

In re State Farm Mutual Auto Ins. Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas
Oct 8, 2003
No. 05-03-01469-CV (Tex. App. Oct. 8, 2003)
Case details for

In re State Farm Mutual Auto Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:IN RE STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Relator

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas

Date published: Oct 8, 2003

Citations

No. 05-03-01469-CV (Tex. App. Oct. 8, 2003)