From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Starbucks Corp.

State of Texas in the Fourteenth Court of Appeals
Sep 4, 2020
NO. 14-20-00609-CV (Tex. App. Sep. 4, 2020)

Opinion

NO. 14-20-00609-CV

09-04-2020

IN RE STARBUCKS CORPORATION, HILTON DISPLAYS, LLC, AND YOUNG ELECTRIC SIGNS COMPANY, Relators


ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS
113th District Court Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 2017-58812

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On September 3, 2020, relators Starbucks Corporation, Hilton Displays, LLC, and Young Electric Signs Company filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov't Code Ann. § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relators ask this court to compel the Honorable Rabeea Sultan Collier, presiding judge of the 113th District Court of Harris County, to vacate her September 2, 2020 order denying relators' emergency motion for continuance and to grant the motion.

Relators have not established that they are entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, we deny relators petition for writ of mandamus. We also deny relators' emergency motion for temporary relief.

PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Christopher, Jewell, and Zimmerer.


Summaries of

In re Starbucks Corp.

State of Texas in the Fourteenth Court of Appeals
Sep 4, 2020
NO. 14-20-00609-CV (Tex. App. Sep. 4, 2020)
Case details for

In re Starbucks Corp.

Case Details

Full title:IN RE STARBUCKS CORPORATION, HILTON DISPLAYS, LLC, AND YOUNG ELECTRIC…

Court:State of Texas in the Fourteenth Court of Appeals

Date published: Sep 4, 2020

Citations

NO. 14-20-00609-CV (Tex. App. Sep. 4, 2020)