In a per curiam order, the court of criminal appeals recites that Sowell "contends that he filed a motion for judgment nunc pro tunc in the trial court, but that the trial court has not ruled on that motion." In re Sowell, No. WR-68,434-05, 2022 WL 852775, at *1 (Tex. Crim. App. Mar. 23, 2022) (order) (per curiam). The court of criminal appeals ordered that "Respondent, the Judge of the 262nd District Court, shall respond as to whether it has ruled on Relator's motion for judgment nunc pro tunc, and if not, why not.