From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Soriano

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jun 7, 2011
206 N.J. 138 (N.J. 2011)

Opinion

June 7, 2011.


ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 10-369, concluding that WILLIAM J. SORIANO of ROSELAND, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1975, should be censured for violating RPC 1.2(d) (assisting a client in fraudulent conduct), RPC 1.5(b) (failing to explain the rate or basis of a fee in writing), RPC 1.7 (conflict of interest), RPC 1.15(b) (failing to deliver funds promptly to clients), RPC 4.1(a)(1) (making a false statement of material fact or law to a third person), RPC 8.4(a) (violating the Rules of Professional Conduct), and RPC 8.4(c) (engaging in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation);

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that WILLIAM J. SORIANO is hereby censured; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent's file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Over-sight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.


Summaries of

In re Soriano

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jun 7, 2011
206 N.J. 138 (N.J. 2011)
Case details for

In re Soriano

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF WILLIAM J. SORIANO, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW (ATTORNEY NO…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: Jun 7, 2011

Citations

206 N.J. 138 (N.J. 2011)
19 A.3d 983

Citing Cases

In re Yannon

; mitigating circumstances justified only a reprimand); In re Agrait, 171 N.J. 1 (2002) (reprimand; despite…

In re Yannon

; mitigating circumstances justified only a reprimand); In re Agrait, 171 N.J. 1 (2002) (reprimand; despite…