From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Smith

Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth
May 25, 2004
No. 02-04-144-CV (Tex. App. May. 25, 2004)

Opinion

No. 02-04-144-CV

Delivered: May 25, 2004.

Original Proceeding.

Cantey Hanger, LLP, Stephen L. Tatum of Fort Worth, TX, for relator (Adam B. SMith, D.O.).

Hon. Len Wade, pro se.

Barlow Garsek, Christopher D. Collins of Fort Worth, TX, for party in real interest (Lynn Brogan and Robert Brogan).

Panel A: McCOY, J.; CAYCE, C.J.; and LIVINGSTON, J.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

See Tex.R.App.P. 47.4.


The court has considered relator's petition for writ of mandamus and is of the opinion that relief should be denied. Accordingly, relator's petition for writ of mandamus is denied.

Relator shall pay all costs of this original proceeding, for which let execution issue.


Summaries of

In re Smith

Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth
May 25, 2004
No. 02-04-144-CV (Tex. App. May. 25, 2004)
Case details for

In re Smith

Case Details

Full title:IN RE ADAM B. SMITH, D.O. RELATOR

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth

Date published: May 25, 2004

Citations

No. 02-04-144-CV (Tex. App. May. 25, 2004)