From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Slohm

United States District Court, W.D. New York
Sep 4, 1935
11 F. Supp. 928 (W.D.N.Y. 1935)

Opinion

No. 21791.

September 4, 1935.

Harold B. Ehrlich, of Buffalo, N.Y., for bankrupt.

Henry Denton, of Elmira, N.Y., for objecting creditor.


On motion for rehearing.

Motion granted.

For former opinion, see 10 F. Supp. 351.


Bankrupt, denied a discharge by reason of a finding that he had made a false statement in writing which was relied upon by the First National Bank Trust Company, the objecting creditor, now moves for a rehearing.

Bankrupt has submitted affidavits presenting facts not presented at the hearing on the petition for discharge, which, if substantiated, would justify the granting of a discharge. To prevent an injustice being done to the bankrupt by reason of findings rendered upon an incomplete record, the motion is granted and the issues again referred to the referee for the taking of testimony, the receipt of evidence, and redetermination.

The objecting creditor questions the jurisdiction of the court to grant such motion. The right to grant a motion for rehearing is inherent. The petition is addressed to the discretion of the court and is designed to afford it an opportunity to correct its own errors. Conboy v. First National Bank of Jersey City, 203 U.S. 141, 27 S. Ct. 50, 51 L. Ed. 128.


Summaries of

In re Slohm

United States District Court, W.D. New York
Sep 4, 1935
11 F. Supp. 928 (W.D.N.Y. 1935)
Case details for

In re Slohm

Case Details

Full title:In re SLOHM

Court:United States District Court, W.D. New York

Date published: Sep 4, 1935

Citations

11 F. Supp. 928 (W.D.N.Y. 1935)

Citing Cases

In re Markman

Granting of a rehearing is within the court's discretion and there is precedent for granting it under the…

In re Day

However, a court of bankruptcy has jurisdiction to grant a rehearing of an application for discharge where…