From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Singireddy

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Feb 21, 2023
5:23-mc-80028 (N.D. Cal. Feb. 21, 2023)

Opinion

5:23-mc-80028

02-21-2023

In the Matter of Tax Indebtedness of KONDAL SINGIREDDY, and NEELIMA SINGIREDDY.


NOTICE AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

You, Kondal and Neelima Singireddy, are hereby notified that the United States has petitioned this Court for an Order allowing the Internal Revenue Service to LEVY upon the real property located at 5457 Manderston Drive, San Jose, California 95138, to sell your interest to satisfy all or part of your unpaid federal tax liabilities based on tax years 2007, 2010, 2015, 2016, 2017, and 2018. The property is legally described as:

All that certain real property situate in the City of San Jose, County of Santa Clara, State of California, described as follows:
PARCEL ONE:
Fee simple title in and to Lot 86, as shown on the Map of Tract No. 8909, “Neighborhood No. 22 - Areas C&D”, filed for record on June 13, 1997, in Book 690 of Maps at page 8, et seq., in the Official Records of the County of Santa Clara, State of California (“Map”).
EXCEPTING THEREFROM, the underground water rights, with no right of surface entry, granted to the City of San Jose, a Municipal corporation, by instrument dated April 29, 1997, recorded June 16, 1997, as Instrument No. 13742573, in the Official Records of the County of Santa Clara, State of California.
FURTHER EXCEPTING THEREFROM, all oils, minerals, gas, casinghead gas, asphaltum and other hydrocarbon and all chemical gas, no or hereafter found, situated or located in all or any part or portion of the real property above-described, lying more than five hundred feet (500') below the surface thereof, together with the right to slant drill or mine for, and remove all or any portion of said substances lying below a depth of more than five hundred feet (500') below the surface thereof, and the right to grant leases for all or any of said purposes; but without any right whatsoever to enter upon the surface of said land or upon any part of said land within five hundred feet (500') vertical distance below the surface thereof.
PARCEL TWO Private Landscape Easement:
An exclusive right and easement appurtenant to Parcel One, above and across the portion of Lot 85 (“Servient Tenement”), as shown on the Map, described in Exhibit “A” attached hereto as “Private Landscape Easement”, (“Landscape Easement”) for the purpose of permitting Grantee to use the landscape Easement for all purposes, including landscaping, recreational use and enjoyment, drainage and other purposes. Notwithstanding the preceding sentence, Grantee shall not (a) place any dirt or fill against the Residence constructed on the Servient Tenement, (b) place any structure or install any landscaping within the Landscape Easement which could materially interfere with maintenance of the Servient Tenement Residence by the Owner of the Servient Tenement, or (c) alter the grade or drainage established by Grantor in any manner which could direct water towards or trap water against the Residence constructed on the Servient Tenement. The Owner of the Servient Tenement shall have the right to enter upon and use the Landscape Easement upon not less than seventy two (72) hours advance written notice for the limited purposes of performing such work during daylight hours as may be necessary or advisable in connection with the maintenance, repair or replacement of the Residence situated on the Servient Tenement. Grantee shall be responsible for all landscaping within the Landscape Easement. This easement is subject to the provisions of Section 3.5.16 of the Declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions of St. Georges at Silver Creek Valley Country Club recorded on December 9, 1997, as Instrument No. 13969352 in the Official Records of the Santa Clara County Recorder, and more particularly described as:
A strip of land of a uniform width of 5.00 feet, the Southeasterly line of which is described as follows:
BEGINNING as the Easterly corner of Lot 85, as said Lot is shown on the Map of said Tract No. 8909; thence from said point of beginning along the Southeasterly line of said Lot 85 S 46°20'00” W 91.42 feet; to the terminus of said strip.
Said easement is bounded on the Northeast by the Northeasterly line of said Lot 85 and on the Southwest at a right angle.
PARCEL THREE Private Courtyard Easement:
An exclusive right and easement appurtenant to Parcel One, above, over and across the portion of Lot 87 (“Servient Tenement”), as shown on the Map, described in Exhibit “A” attached hereto as “Private Courtyard Easement” (“Courtyard Easement”) for the purpose of permitting Grantee to use the Courtyard Easement for all purposes, including landscaping, drainage and other purposes. Notwithstanding the preceding sentence, Grantee shall not (a) place any dirt or fill against the Residence constructed on the Servient Tenement, (b) place any structure or install any landscaping within the Courtyard Easement which could materially interfere with maintenance of the Servient Tenement Residence by the Owner of the Servient Tenement, or (c) alter the grade or drainage established by Grantor in any manner which could direct water towards or trap water against the Residence constructed on the Servient Tenement. or (d) remove or alter the draining swale installed by Grantor within the Courtyard Easement. The Owner of the Servient
Tenement shall have the right to enter upon and use the Courtyard Easement upon not less than seventy two (72) hours advance written notice for the limited purposes of performing such work during daylight hours as may be necessary or advisable in connection with the maintenance, repair or replacement of the Residence situated on the Servient Tenement. Grantee shall be responsible for all landscaping within the Courtyard Easement. This easement is subject to the provisions of Section 3.5.15 of the Declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions of St. Georges at Silver Creek Valley Country Club recorded on December 9, 1997, as Instrument No. 13969352 in the Official Records of the Santa Clara County Recorder, and more particularly described as:
A strip of land of a uniform width of 5.00 feet, the Northwesterly line of which is described as follows:
BEGINNING at a point on the Northwesterly line of Lot 87, as said Lot is shown on the Map of said Tract No. 8909; said point bears along said line N 46°20'00” E 16.90 feet from the most Westerly corner of said Lot 87; thence from said point of beginning along said Northwesterly line N 46°20'00” E 20.00 feet to the terminus of said strip.

This Court has examined the Petition of the United States and accompanying Declaration of Aspen J. Cruise, and it is hereby ORDERED that you have 30 days from the date of this Order to file with the Clerk of Court a written Objection to the Petition. Any written Objection to the Petition should demonstrate either that:

A. Your federal tax liabilities have been satisfied; OR
B. You have other assets from which the unpaid liabilities can be satisfied; OR
C. Applicable laws and administrative procedures relevant to the levy were not followed by the Internal Revenue Service.

It is further ORDERED that if you file a written Objection to the Petition with the Clerk of Court, then the Court will hold a hearing, at which you must appear, on April 18, 2023, at10:00 a.m. at the Robert F. Peckham Federal Building and United States Courthouse, 280 South First Street, San Jose, California 95113, in the courtroom of the undersigned, to consider your objections.

It is further ORDERED that, in addition to filing your Objection to the Petition with the Clerk of Court, you must also mail a copy of your Objection to the Petition to counsel for the United States at Lolita De Palma, Department of Justice Tax Division, P.O. Box 683, Washington, D.C. 20044, on or before the filing date.

A copy of this Order, together with the Petition and its exhibits, shall be served in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(e) within ten days of this Order. Pursuant to Rule 4.1(a), the Court hereby appoints IRS Revenue Officer Aspen J. Cruise, or any other person designated by the IRS, to effect service in this case. Proof of service shall be filed by the United States before the hearing.

If you do not file an Objection to the Petition within 30 days of the date of this Order, or if you file an Objection to the Petition but fail to appear before the Court as instructed, the Court will enter an ORDER APPROVING LEVY UPON PRINCIPAL RESIDENCE authorizing the sale of real property located at 5457 Manderston Drive, San Jose, California 95138

All Parties must file a consent/declination to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction by March 10, 2023. Form available at: https://cand.uscourts.gov/wp-content/uploads/forms/civil-forms/ MJConsent-DeclinationForm10-2020.pdf


Summaries of

In re Singireddy

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Feb 21, 2023
5:23-mc-80028 (N.D. Cal. Feb. 21, 2023)
Case details for

In re Singireddy

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Tax Indebtedness of KONDAL SINGIREDDY, and NEELIMA…

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Feb 21, 2023

Citations

5:23-mc-80028 (N.D. Cal. Feb. 21, 2023)