From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Simonetta

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
May 21, 2021
959 N.W.2d 170 (Mich. 2021)

Opinion

SC: 162710 COA: 354081

05-21-2021

IN RE A. S-K. SIMONETTA, Minor.


Order

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 18, 2021 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we VACATE that part of the Court of Appeals opinion holding that the trial court made the requisite judicial determination that the respondent subjected AS to the circumstances provided for in MCL 722.638(1) and (2), and satisfied the requirements of MCR 3.977(E) necessary to terminate the respondent's parental rights without requiring reasonable efforts at reunification. We REVERSE the St. Clair Circuit Court's March 10, 2020 order terminating the respondent's parental rights and we REMAND this case to that court. Reasonable efforts to reunify the child and family must be made in all cases except those involving the circumstances delineated in MCL 712A.19a(2). In re Mason , 486 Mich. 142, 152, 782 N.W.2d 747 (2010). On remand, the circuit court shall either order that the petitioner provide reasonable services to the respondent, or articulate a factual finding based on clear and convincing evidence that aggravated circumstances exist such that services are not required. The proceedings on remand are limited to these issues. The trial court shall decide the issues on remand within 56 days of this order.

We do not retain jurisdiction.

Zahra and Viviano, JJ., would deny leave to appeal.


Summaries of

In re Simonetta

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
May 21, 2021
959 N.W.2d 170 (Mich. 2021)
Case details for

In re Simonetta

Case Details

Full title:In re A. S-K. SIMONETTA, Minor.

Court:Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Date published: May 21, 2021

Citations

959 N.W.2d 170 (Mich. 2021)

Citing Cases

In re Simonetta

In a brief order, the Supreme Court vacated the part of the Court of Appeals’ decision "holding that the…

In re Hidalgo

In re Hicks/Brown, 500 Mich. 79, 85; 893 N.W.2d 637 (2017). Recently, in an order remanding to the circuit…