From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Seitz

Supreme Court of Ohio
Jan 28, 1953
110 N.E.2d 488 (Ohio 1953)

Opinion

No. 33341

Decided January 28, 1953.

Supreme Court — Dismissal — No debatable constitutional question involved — Guardian and ward — Proceeding to terminate guardianship — Bond — Necessity for two personal sureties — Section 10506-5, General Code — Bond signed by guardian as principal and one personal surety — Ample security provided — Guardian's appointment not void — Necessity for continuation of guardianship.

APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Auglaize county.

Mr. Victor F. Schmidt, for appellant, Luetta S. Chambers.

Mr. Edward Stroebel, for appellee, Nelson Kantner, guardian.


It is ordered and adjudged that this appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.

Appeal dismissed.

WEYGANDT, C.J., MIDDLETON, TAFT, MATTHIAS, HART, ZIMMERMAN and STEWART, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

In re Seitz

Supreme Court of Ohio
Jan 28, 1953
110 N.E.2d 488 (Ohio 1953)
Case details for

In re Seitz

Case Details

Full title:IN RE GUARDIANSHIP OF SEITZ

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Jan 28, 1953

Citations

110 N.E.2d 488 (Ohio 1953)
110 N.E.2d 488

Citing Cases

Beal v. Elyria

In addition to contesting the constitutionality and legality of the joint undertaking herein, the plaintiff…