From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Seidel

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Oct 7, 2010
Case No. 2:10-mc-0035 (S.D. Ohio Oct. 7, 2010)

Opinion

Case No. 2:10-mc-0035.

October 7, 2010


ORDER


This matter now before the Court is the Appellant Michael W. Warren's Emergency Motion for Stay Pending Appeal and For Approval of Supersedeas Bond. Despite the Appellant's arguments to the contrary, pursuant to the local bankruptcy rules, the parties have 21 days in which to file a reply to this Motion. Specifically, this Court finds that the U.S. Trustee, the standing Chapter 13 trustee, and the Debtor may wish to reply to this Motion and should be afforded adequate time to do so.

In addition, this Court finds that the Appellant failed to request an expedited hearing when filing this motion as required by the local bankruptcy rules. R.L.B.R. 9073-1.

For the reasons stated above, this Court DENIES Appellant's Emergency Motion for Stay Pending Appeal and For Approval of Supersedeas Bond.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATE: October 7, 2010


Summaries of

In re Seidel

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Oct 7, 2010
Case No. 2:10-mc-0035 (S.D. Ohio Oct. 7, 2010)
Case details for

In re Seidel

Case Details

Full title:IN RE: LINDA SEIDEL, Debtor, v. MICHAEL W. WARREN, Apellant

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division

Date published: Oct 7, 2010

Citations

Case No. 2:10-mc-0035 (S.D. Ohio Oct. 7, 2010)