From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Sanders

Supreme Court of Louisiana.
Sep 27, 2021
323 So. 3d 860 (La. 2021)

Opinion

No. 2021-B-00776

09-27-2021

IN RE: Shalita Kelly SANDERS


Joint petition for consent discipline accepted. See per curiam.

Crichton, J., would reject as too lenient.

Genovese, J., would reject as too lenient.

McCallum, J., would reject as too lenient.

ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDING

PER CURIAM

The Office of Disciplinary Counsel ("ODC") commenced an investigation into allegations that respondent mishandled her client trust account. Respondent and the ODC then submitted a joint petition for consent discipline. Having reviewed the petition,

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that Shalita Kelly Sanders, Louisiana Bar Roll number 31217, be publicly reprimanded.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondent shall be placed on unsupervised probation for a period of two years, subject to the conditions set forth in the petition for consent discipline.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty days from the date of finality of this court's judgment until paid.


Summaries of

In re Sanders

Supreme Court of Louisiana.
Sep 27, 2021
323 So. 3d 860 (La. 2021)
Case details for

In re Sanders

Case Details

Full title:IN RE: Shalita Kelly SANDERS

Court:Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Date published: Sep 27, 2021

Citations

323 So. 3d 860 (La. 2021)