From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Rutherford

Supreme Court of Ohio
May 6, 1998
693 N.E.2d 1087 (Ohio 1998)

Opinion

No. 97-2727

Submitted and decided May 6, 1998.

ON NOTIFICATION from the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline of the Supreme Court.


On March 6, 1998, this court suspended respondent, Guy Rutherford, a.k.a. Guy Darius Rutherford, for an interim period pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(5)(A)(4). On April 17, 1998, the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline submitted an entry pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(5)(D)(1)(c), notifying this court that respondent no longer was in default of the child support order previously submitted to the court. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(5)(D)(1), respondent, Guy Rutherford, a.k.a. Guy Darius Rutherford, Attorney Registration No. 0066032, be reinstated to the practice of law.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(5)(D)(2), reinstatement of respondent shall not terminate any pending disciplinary proceedings against respondent.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication.

For earlier case, see In re Rutherford (1998), 81 Ohio St.3d 1254, 691 N.E.2d 1049.

MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

In re Rutherford

Supreme Court of Ohio
May 6, 1998
693 N.E.2d 1087 (Ohio 1998)
Case details for

In re Rutherford

Case Details

Full title:IN RE RUTHERFORD

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: May 6, 1998

Citations

693 N.E.2d 1087 (Ohio 1998)
693 N.E.2d 1087