From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Rudnicki

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
May 11, 2021
No. 05-21-00127-CV (Tex. App. May. 11, 2021)

Opinion

No. 05-21-00127-CV

05-11-2021

IN RE PAUL RUDNICKI, Relator


Original Proceeding from the 68th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. DC-18-00644

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Schenck, Nowell, and Garcia
Opinion by Justice Garcia

Relator's February 26, 2021 petition for writ of mandamus challenges the trial court's order denying leave to designate a responsible third party. To be entitled to mandamus relief, relator must demonstrate that the trial court has clearly abused its discretion and that he has no adequate appellate remedy. In re Prudential Ins. Co., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135-36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). Based on our review of the petition, the response, and the record before us, we conclude that relator has failed to show his entitlement to the relief requested.

Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).

/Dennise Garcia/

DENNISE GARCIA

JUSTICE Schenck, J. dissenting 210127F.P05


Summaries of

In re Rudnicki

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
May 11, 2021
No. 05-21-00127-CV (Tex. App. May. 11, 2021)
Case details for

In re Rudnicki

Case Details

Full title:IN RE PAUL RUDNICKI, Relator

Court:Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

Date published: May 11, 2021

Citations

No. 05-21-00127-CV (Tex. App. May. 11, 2021)