From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Ronald A. Katz Tech. Licensing, L.P.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Nov 7, 2013
540 F. App'x 995 (Fed. Cir. 2013)

Opinion

2013-1137

11-07-2013

IN RE: RONALD A. KATZ TECHNOLOGY LICENSING, L.P.,

FRANK V. PIETRANTONIO, Cooley LLP, of Reston, Virginia, argued for appellant. With him on the brief were JONATHAN G. GRAVES, of Reston, Virginia, and LORI R. MASON and LOWELL D. MEAD of Palo Alto, California. THOMAS W. KRAUSE, Associate Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, of Alexandria, Virginia argued for appellee. Of counsel on the brief were NATHAN K. KELLEY, Deputy Solicitor, and STACY B. MARGOLIES, Associate Solicitor.


NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Reexamination No. 90/008,057.

JUDGMENT

FRANK V. PIETRANTONIO, Cooley LLP, of Reston, Virginia, argued for appellant. With him on the brief were JONATHAN G. GRAVES, of Reston, Virginia, and LORI R. MASON and LOWELL D. MEAD of Palo Alto, California.

THOMAS W. KRAUSE, Associate Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, of Alexandria, Virginia argued for appellee. Of counsel on the brief were NATHAN K. KELLEY, Deputy Solicitor, and STACY B. MARGOLIES, Associate Solicitor. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (WALLACH, LINN, and TARANTO, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

________________________

Daniel E. O'Toole

Clerk of Court


Summaries of

In re Ronald A. Katz Tech. Licensing, L.P.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Nov 7, 2013
540 F. App'x 995 (Fed. Cir. 2013)
Case details for

In re Ronald A. Katz Tech. Licensing, L.P.

Case Details

Full title:IN RE: RONALD A. KATZ TECHNOLOGY LICENSING, L.P.,

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Nov 7, 2013

Citations

540 F. App'x 995 (Fed. Cir. 2013)