From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Rodriguez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 14, 1996
233 A.D.2d 647 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

November 14, 1996.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Bradley, J.), entered December 18, 1995 in Albany County, which, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, granted respondents' motion to dismiss the petition as moot.

Before: Cardona, P.J., Mikoll, Mercure, Spain and Carpinello, JJ.


Petitioner, a prison inmate, commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding to challenge an administrative determination placing him in involuntary protective custody (hereinafter IPC) after several death threats had been made against him by other inmates. Supreme Court dismissed the petition as moot and we affirm. Petitioner spent only nine days in IPC after which he was transferred to another facility and housed with the general inmate population. As a result of petitioner's prompt release from IPC, he has already received the relief to which he is entitled. Hence, his CPLR article 78 proceeding was properly dismissed as moot ( see, Matter of Ortiz v Coughlin, 199 AD2d 646, appeal dismissed 83 NY2d 800; Matter of Graham v Scully, 113 AD2d 990). We also note that this proceeding was untimely commenced in August 1995, well beyond the four-month limitations period, triggered in December 1994, when the decision for which petitioner sought review was rendered ( see, CPLR 217).

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.


Summaries of

In re Rodriguez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 14, 1996
233 A.D.2d 647 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

In re Rodriguez

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of NELSON RODRIGUEZ, Appellant, v. PHILIP COOMBE, JR., as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Nov 14, 1996

Citations

233 A.D.2d 647 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
649 N.Y.S.2d 832

Citing Cases

Rivera v. Selsky

The Attorney General has informed this Court that petitioner has been transferred to another correctional…

Matter of Erdheim v. Senkowski

Although there is some confusion over exactly when petitioner received notice that his grievance had been…