Opinion
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED
Del Norte County Super. Ct. No. JDSQ086257
Reardon, J.
Appellant minor, Robert S., commenced his career in the juvenile justice system in December 2008, when he admitted allegations in a 602 petition that he received stolen property (Pen. Code, § 496, subd. (a)) and was intoxicated in public (id., § 647, subd. (f)), as misdemeanors. He was declared a ward of the court and granted probation.
In November 2009, a probation violation was filed alleging that appellant failed to obey all laws. He ultimately admitted five such allegations. Another probation violation was filed in December 2009, alleging that appellant failed to provide a urine sample as directed by the probation department. He admitted the violation and was continued on probation on certain terms and conditions. In January 2010, it was again alleged that appellant failed to provide a urine sample. Appellant admitted the violation and was ordered to attend two “12 step meetings” per week.
Between January 2010 and June 2010, appellant had numerous drug court reviews. He tested positive for illegal substances on four occasions.
In July 2010, a probation violation was filed alleging that appellant possessed hydrocodone pills. He admitted this violation and wardship was continued with a juvenile hall commitment. In December 2010, another violation was filed alleging that appellant tested positive for use of barbiturates. At the conclusion of a contested hearing, the court sustained one of the allegations that appellant tested positive. Finally, on December 21, 2010, the probation department filed another probation violation alleging that appellant tested positive for methadone and submitted a diluted urine sample. At the conclusion of a contested hearing, the court sustained the positive methadone test allegation and the diluted urine sample allegation. Appellant continued as a ward of the court and received a juvenile commitment of 48-96 hours. Appellant has appealed from the findings and orders of the juvenile court.
Counsel for appellant has filed an opening brief raising no issues and asking this court for an independent review of the record pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436. We have conducted the requested review and conclude that there are no arguable issues.
Appellant was represented throughout the proceedings by counsel. Appellant admitted the probation violation allegations and, where contested, the record supports the findings of the juvenile court. There was no error in the disposition. There are no arguable issues.
The orders are affirmed.
We concur: Ruvolo, P.J., Rivera, J.