In re R.J. Groover Const., L.L.C.

2 Citing cases

  1. Saber Sec. & Investigations, LLC v. Raines (In re Raines)

    Number 08-4I972-EJC (Bankr. S.D. Ga. Nov. 17, 2014)

    However, the Court agrees with Saber that Lumpert appears to have a continuing incentive (albeit with no obligation) to fund Debtor's defense in the Cobb County litigation; therefore, to the extent it applies, this factor weighs slightly in favor of granting stay relief. See In re Dallas, 2011 WL 6101832, at *2 ("[T]he cost of defending, alone, is not a 'great prejudice.'" (citing In re R.J. Groover, 411 B.R. at 479)). Although Saber may contend that Debtor is indispensable to the Cobb County litigation, this dispute is mainly between Poncinie (acting through Saber) and Lumpert, individually and as the sole owner of Security Associates. Consequently, the sixth factor weighs only slightly in favor of lifting the stay.

  2. Builders Insurance Group, Inc. v. R.J. Groover Construction, LLC (In re R.J. Groover Construction, LLC)

    411 B.R. 473 (Bankr. S.D. Ga. 2008)   Cited 6 times

    (12) impact of the stay on the parties and the balance of the harms. In re Groover, 411 BR 460, 462-64, 2008 WL 6781831, *2-3 (Bkrtcy.S.D.Ga.2008) (citations omitted). In weighing these factors, this Court does not need to specifically address each of them, but instead only needs to consider those factors relevant to the particular case, and does not need to assign them equal weight.