From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Rivers v. New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 20, 2008
49 A.D.3d 436 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)

Opinion

No. 3143.

March 20, 2008.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Lewis Bart Stone, J.), entered September 6, 2007, which granted respondents' cross motion to dismiss the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 seeking to annul respondents' determination disqualifying petitioner from consideration for the position of sanitation worker, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Silberman Rhine, LLP, New York (Martin N. Silberman of counsel), for appellant.

Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York (Ann E. Scherzer of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Tom, J.P., Friedman, Nardelli, Catterson and Moskowitz, JJ.


Contrary to petitioner's contention, the court did not convert the cross motion to dismiss the petition for failure to state a cause of action into a motion for summary judgment without notice. Rather, the court, pursuant to CPLR 7804 (f), properly found that petitioner failed to state a legally cognizable cause of action that respondents acted arbitrarily, capriciously, or without a rational basis, where the record evidence establishes that the determination finding petitioner medically not qualified for the position of sanitation worker was rationally based upon the findings that she suffered from left ventricular hypertrophy and had elevated blood pressure. When arriving at its determination, respondents were entitled to rely on the conclusions of respondent Department of Sanitation's medical director even in the face of conflicting opinions from petitioner's physicians ( see McCabe v Hoberman, 33 AD2d 547; Matter of Winnegar v County of Suffolk, 13 AD3d 382). [ See 2007 NY Slip Op 32740(U).]


Summaries of

In re Rivers v. New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 20, 2008
49 A.D.3d 436 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
Case details for

In re Rivers v. New York

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of ALMETTA RIVERS, Appellant, v. NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 20, 2008

Citations

49 A.D.3d 436 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
2008 N.Y. Slip Op. 2645
854 N.Y.S.2d 64

Citing Cases

In Matter of Prochilo v. Gourdine

" Nor did Dr. Obas give any weight to the department's own medical and fitness exams, which Prochilo had…

Gagliano v. N.Y.C. Fire Dep't

Respondents’ determination was not arbitrary and capricious, or without a rational basis. The record…