From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Rivera

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Apr 8, 2016
644 F. App'x 1011 (Fed. Cir. 2016)

Opinion

2015-1683

04-08-2016

IN RE: ADRIAN RIVERA, Appellant

SUDIP KUMAR KUNDU, Kundu PLLC, Washington, DC, argued for appellant. MONICA BARNES LATEEF, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for intervenor, Michelle K. Lee. Also represented by THOMAS W. KRAUSE, SCOTT WEIDENFELLER, FARHEENA YASMEEN RASHEED.


NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2014-00042.

JUDGMENT

SUDIP KUMAR KUNDU, Kundu PLLC, Washington, DC, argued for appellant. MONICA BARNES LATEEF, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for intervenor, Michelle K. Lee. Also represented by THOMAS W. KRAUSE, SCOTT WEIDENFELLER, FARHEENA YASMEEN RASHEED. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (WALLACH, MAYER, and TARANTO, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT April 8, 2016

Date

/s/ Daniel E. O'Toole

Daniel E. O'Toole

Clerk of Court


Summaries of

In re Rivera

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Apr 8, 2016
644 F. App'x 1011 (Fed. Cir. 2016)
Case details for

In re Rivera

Case Details

Full title:IN RE: ADRIAN RIVERA, Appellant

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Apr 8, 2016

Citations

644 F. App'x 1011 (Fed. Cir. 2016)