From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Rivera

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Sep 17, 2009
65 A.D.3d 1419 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)

Opinion

No. 506584.

September 17, 2009.

Appeal from a decision of the Unemplpyment Insurance Appeal Board, filed January 6, 2009, which ruled that claimant was ineligible to receive additional unemployment insurance benefits pursuant to Labor Law § 599.

Inez Rivera, New York City, appellant pro se.

Andrew M. Cuomo, Attorney General, New York City (Steven Koton of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Cardona, P.J., Peters, Rose, Kane and McCarthy, JJ., concur.


Claimant was formerly employed as a project manager and administrative assistant for a construction company earning $60,000 per year. After being approved for regular unemployment benefits, claimant applied for career training benefits pursuant to Labor Law § 599 (1) to pursue a Bachelor's degree in psychology for the purpose of becoming a school guidance counselor. After various proceedings, the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board denied her application and claimant now appeals.

We affirm. To be eligible for additional training benefits, as relevant here, a claimant must engage in training that "will upgrade the claimant's existing skill or train the claimant for an occupation likely to lead to more regular long term employment" (Labor Law § 599 [a] [1]) or there must be a showing that employment opportunities for the claimant are or may be impaired because of "existing or prospective conditions of the labor market" (Labor Law § 599 [a] [2] [i]; see Matter of Schroder [Commissioner of Labor], 38 AD3d 1142, 1142-1143; Matter of Alduen [Commissioner of Labor], 26 AD3d 579, 579-580). Evidence was introduced at the administrative hearing that the market for administrative assistants is expected to show considerable growth in the New York City region in the coming years and claimant acknowledged during the hearing that job opportunities in this field were "very common." As a result, we find that substantial evidence supports the Board's decision to deny claimant benefits ( see Matter of Alduen [Commissioner of Labor], 26 AD3d at 580).

Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.


Summaries of

In re Rivera

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Sep 17, 2009
65 A.D.3d 1419 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
Case details for

In re Rivera

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of INEZ RIVERA, Appellant. COMMISSIONER OF…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Sep 17, 2009

Citations

65 A.D.3d 1419 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 6492
885 N.Y.S.2d 231