In re Rissio

Full title: IN RE: JOHN RISSIO, JOHN CAMERON, Appellants

Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Dec 19, 2017

2017-1090 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 19, 2017)

Opinion

2017-1090

12-19-2017

IN RE: JOHN RISSIO, JOHN CAMERON, Appellants

JAMES W. PROSCIA, Brooks Kushman PC, Southfield, MI, argued for appellants. Also represented by MARK A. CANTOR. KAKOLI CAPRIHAN, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Joseph Matal. Also represented by NATHAN K. KELLEY, THOMAS W. KRAUSE, AMY J. NELSON.

PER CURIAM

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 12/672,385.

JUDGMENT

JAMES W. PROSCIA, Brooks Kushman PC, Southfield, MI, argued for appellants. Also represented by MARK A. CANTOR. KAKOLI CAPRIHAN, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Joseph Matal. Also represented by NATHAN K. KELLEY, THOMAS W. KRAUSE, AMY J. NELSON. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, NEWMAN and STOLL, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT December 19, 2017

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court